A Comparative Analysis of Compressive and Flexural Strength in Concrete with Partial Cement Replacement using Waste Glass Powder

Authors

  • Hedayat Ullah Safi Lecturer/MSc. Civil and Industrial Construction, Kabul Polytechnic University, Kabul, 1003, Afghanistan
  • Mohammad Mukhlis Behsoodi VC. Academics, Spinghar Institute of Higher Education, Jalalabad, 2602, Afghanistan
  • Mohammad Naseer Sharifi Lecturer, Department of Civil and Industrial Construction, Faculty of Construction, Kabul Polytechnic University, Kabul, 1003, Afghanistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26554/ijmr.20242120

Keywords:

Compressive and Flexural Strength , Cement Replacement , Concrete , Waste Glass Powder (WGP)

Abstract

This experimental inquiry delves into the evaluation of compressive and flexural strengths in concrete through the utilization of waste glass powder as a partial substitute for cement. Compressive strength is a key metric, indicating the concrete’s ability to effectively support structural axial loads, while flexural strength signifies its capacity to withstand deformation under bending, specifically the maximum tensile stress it can endure without fracturing when subjected to a bending moment. Certain pozzolanic materials have demonstrated the ability to enhance the mechanical strength of concrete when used as a cement replacement, and waste glass powder is among them. To address this, the experimental investigation included the substitution of cement with glass powder at different proportions (0%, 10%, 15%, 17.5%, and 20%) in both cubic and prismatic samples. Compressive strength and flexural strength tests were made following the curing of the samples for 7, 14, and 28 days. The findings indicated that the 17.5% cement replacement level exhibited a 6.07% over-strength for compressive strength and a 6.85% over-strength for flexural strength on the 28th day. However, the 15% replacement showed superior strength compared to a 10% replacement, and the 10% replacement was stronger than a 0% cement replacement. Notably, the 20% cement replacement displayed negative over-strength percentages, specifically -2.42% in compressive strength and -1.42% in flexural strength on the 28th day. This deviation raises concerns about its suitability for use in concrete applications, signifying that a 20% replacement may not be recommended.

Author Biography

Mohammad Mukhlis Behsoodi, VC. Academics, Spinghar Institute of Higher Education, Jalalabad, 2602, Afghanistan

2 VC. Academics, Spinghar Institute of Higher Education, Jalalabad, 2602, Afghanistan

3 Visiting Lecturer, Department of Civil Engineering, Alfalah University, Jalalabad, 2602, Afghanistan

References

Abbaslou, H. (2017). Effects of Mix Design and Curing Time on Compressive and Tensile Strength of Bentonite Plastic Concrete. Concrete Research, 10(2); 109–124

ACI Committee 318 (2019). 318-19 Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary. American Concrete Institute

Ahmed, M., J. Mallick, and M. A. Hasan (2016). A Study of Factors Affecting the Flexural Tensile Strength of Concrete. Journal of King Saud University-Engineering Sciences, 28(2); 147–156

Aliabdo, A. A., M. Abd Elmoaty, and A. Y. Aboshama (2016). Utilization of Waste Glass Powder in the Production of Cement and Concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 124; 866–877

Amin, M. N., T. Murtaza, K. Shahzada, K. Khan, and M. Adil (2019). Pozzolanic Potential and Mechanical Performance of Wheat Straw Ash Incorporated Sustainable Concrete. Sustainability, 11(2); 519

ASTM International (2015). Standard Test Method for Specific Gravity and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate. Technical report

ASTM International (2019). Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete (Using Simple Beam with Third-Point Loading). Technical Report Hand The, C78-02(C)

ASTM International (2020a). Performance Examination - Aggregate Standard Test Method for Bulk Density (“Unit Weight”) and Voids. Technical Report Performance Examination

ASTM International (2020b). Standard Practice for Making and Curing Concrete Test Specimens in the Laboratory. Technical Report 04

ASTM International (2020c). Standard Test Method for Relative Density (Specific Gravity) and Absorption of Fine Aggregate. Technical report

ASTM International (2021a). Standard Specification for Portland Cement. Technical Report 10(Reapproved)

ASTM International (2021b). Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens. Technical Report 10(Reapproved)

ASTM International (2021c). Standard Test Method for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates. Technical Report 10(Reapproved)

Bravo-German, A. M., I. D. Bravo-Gómez, J. A. Mesa, and A. Maury-Ramírez (2021). Mechanical Properties of Concrete Using Recycled Aggregates Obtained from Old Paving Stones. Sustainability, 13(6); 3044

Chaabene, W. B., M. Flah, and M. L. Nehdi (2020). Machine Learning Prediction of Mechanical Properties of Concrete: Critical Review. Construction and Building Materials, 260; 119889

Esmaeili, J. and A. O. AL-Mwanes (2021). A Review: Properties of Eco-Friendly Ultra-High Performance Concrete Incorporated with Waste Glass As a Partial Replacement for Cement. Materials Today: Proceedings, 42; 1958–1965

Gagg, C. R. (2014). Cement and Concrete As an Engineering Material: An Historic Appraisal and Case Study Analysis. Engineering Failure Analysis, 40; 114–140

Gamil, Y. (2023). Machine Learning in Concrete Technology: A Review of Current Researches, Trends, and Applications. Frontiers in Built Environment, 9; 1145591

Ghouleh, Z. and Y. Shao (2018). Turning Municipal Solid Waste Incineration into a Cleaner Cement Production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 195; 268–279

Girish, M. G., K. K. Shetty, and G. Nayak (2023). Effect of Slag Sand on Mechanical Strengths and Fatigue Performance of Paving Grade Geopolymer Concrete. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology; 1–18

Gowtham, R. and S. M. Prabhu (2021). Utilization of Waste Glass Powder as a Cementitious Material in Concrete. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1070; 012040

Gupta, R., R. Choudhary, A. Jain, R. Yadav, and R. Nagar (2021). Performance Assessment of High Strength Concrete Comprising Marble Cutting Waste and Fly Ash. Materials Today: Proceedings, 42; 572–577

Habert, G., S. A. Miller, V. M. John, J. L. Provis, A. Favier, A. Horvath, and K. L. Scrivener (2020). Environmental Impacts and Decarbonization Strategies in the Cement and Concrete Industries. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 1(11); 559–573

Han, B., L. Zhang, and J. Ou (2017). Smart and Multifunctional Concrete toward Sustainable Infrastructures. Springer

Haque, N. and M. D. Ashraful (2020). Performance Evaluation of Engineered Concrete with Recycled Waste Polypropylene. Technical report

Jurczak, R., F. Szmatuła, T. Rudnicki, and J. Korentz (2021). Effect of Ground Waste Glass Addition on the Strength and Durability of Low Strength Concrete Mixes. Materials, 14(1); 1–15

Marí, A., J. Bairán, A. Cladera, E. Oller, and C. Ribas (2015). Shear-Flexural Strength Mechanical Model for the Design and Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Beams. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 11(11); 1399–1419

Mehta, P. K. and P. J. Monteiro (2014). Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Materials. McGraw-Hill Education

Mohaghegh, A. M., J. Silfwerbrand, and V. Arskog (2017). Flexural Behaviour of Medium-Strength and High-Performance Macro Basalt Fibre Concrete Aimed for Marine Applications. Nordic Concrete Research, 57(2); 103–123

Pashtoon, M. I., S. Miakhil, and M. M. Behsoodi (2022). Waste Glass Powder “An Alternative of Cement in Concrete”: A Review. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 5(7)

Pashtoon, M. I., S. U. MİAKHİL, and M. M. Behsoodi (2023). Waste Glass "an Alternative of Cement and Fine Aggregate in Concrete". International Journal of Engineering Technologies, 8(2); 70–76

Qin, D., Y. Hu, and X. Li (2021). Waste Glass Utilization in Cement-Based Materials for Sustainable Construction: A Review. Journal of Cleaner Production

Raju, S. and P. R. Kumar (2015). Effect of Using Glass Powder in Concrete. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 4(5); 421–427

Sakale, R., S. Jain, and S. Singh (2016). Experimental Investigation on Strength of Glass Powder Replacement by Cement in Concrete with Different Dosages. IJSTE-International Journal of Science Technology & Engineering, 2(8); 76–86

Shirzad, W., M. M. Behsoodi, and M. Y. Tasal (2023). Utilization and Effects of Various Particle Sizes of Waste Glass Powder as Partial Replacement of Cement in Concrete. International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal, 7(3); 191–199

Subramani, T. and S. B. S. Ram (2015). Experimental Study on Concrete Using Cement With Glass Powder. IOSR Journal of Engineering (IOSRJEN), 05(05); 3–43

Surahyo, A. (2019). Physical Properties of Concrete. In A. Surahyo, editor, Concrete Construction: Practical Problems and Solutions. Springer International Publishing, pages 61–88

Thomas, M. D. A., D. Smith, E. G. Moffatt, and M. Kasaniya (2021). The Use of Ground Glass as a Pozzolan. American Concrete Institute, ACI Special Publication, SP-349(1974); 752–761

Yuan, P., B. Zhang, Y. Yang, T. Jiang, J. Li, J. Qiu, and H. He (2023). Application of Polymer Cement Repair Mortar in Underground Engineering: A Review. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 19; e02555

Downloads

Published

2024-03-26

Issue

Section

Articles